C‑746/22. – Slovenské Energetické Strojárne a.s. (SES) | In the international VAT refund procedure under Directive 2008/9/EC (Directive), the taxpayer must be allowed to supplement the […]
C‑89/23. – Companhia União de Crédito Popular SA | The commission received by the lender for the sale of the pledged item, which ensures the provision […]
C‑68/23. – M‑GbR | The European Court of Justice interpreted the common concept of “single-purpose voucher” The plaintiff in the case is a German economic entity […]
C‑657/22. – SC Bitulpetrolium Serv SRL | Citing administrative shortcomings, an additional excise duty cannot be imposed if it does not correspond to the actual use […]
C‑509/22. – Girelli Alcool Srl | In the case of using excise goods under customs control, the destruction or irreparable damage due to the negligence of […]
C‑316/22. – GABEL Industria and Co. | Consumers cannot be prevented from directly claiming back unlawfully charged excise duty from the Member State. The plaintiffs in […]
C‑122/23. – „Legafact” EOOD | The judgement in case “Legafact” might be instructive for Member States applying revenue thresholds for VAT registration. The European Court of […]
C‑336/22. – f6 Cigarettenfabrik GmbH & Co. KG | The German supplementary excise duty imposed on heated tobacco is in line with EU law. The plaintiff […]